Evaluation for 2.2b
Materials provide guidance for the use of included tasks and activities to respond to student trends in performance on assessments.
The materials provide various assessments. For example, the
Teacher Guide for Brass Instrument Fingering Quizzes provides guidance for using the included assessment tasks. The guide states that the quizzes can be used as diagnostic, formative, or summative assessments and are configured by grade level and instrument range. It also explains that question order and multiple-choice responses are randomized for each administration, allowing educators to reassign the quizzes to the same students multiple times. This guidance supports the repeated use of the assessment to monitor students’ performance over time. However, the materials do not provide specific guidance on selecting instructional tasks or activities in response to identified students’ performance trends.
The
Teacher Guide for Aural Skills Development & Practice identifies assessments for diagnostic, formative, and summative purposes. This guide highlights Listening Worksheets Levels I–IV as diagnostic tools. The guide also identifies Auralia assessments for multiple aural skills. However, the materials do not guide educators on how to use assessment results or student performance trends to select, adjust, or implement specific instructional tasks and activities.
The
MusicFirst High School Music, Level IV curriculum provides grading information through the
Teacher Gradebook and the
Student Gradebook. These gradebooks record results and feedback for automatically scored and educator-scored assignments and assessments. Although educators can access students’ performance data, the materials provide limited guidance for analyzing results, identifying learning gaps, or using assessment data to plan instruction.
The materials provide tasks/activities in the
Assessment Guide. However, guidance on how to respond to student trends in performance is not provided. The materials state that “any tasks may be used for diagnostic, formative, or summative assessment.” But this statement does not guide educators on which assessment or task best fits student trends.