Instructional Materials Review and Approval

Hands-On Standards Mini-Lessons - Algebra I

Supplemental Math (English) Grade 9

IMRA 2025

Publisher: hand2mind, Inc.

Copyright: 2022

Quality Review

Standards Alignment

Rubric Section
Grade TEKS Student % TEKS Teacher % ELPS Student % ELPS Teacher %
Grade 9 100% N/A N/A N/A

Criteria for Quality

Rubric Section 1 Intentional Instructional Design Materials support educators in effective implementation through intentional course, unit, and lesson-level design. Total TOTAL78% (18 out of 23 points) 78%
Section 1 Intentional Instructional Design Materials support educators in effective implementation through intentional course, unit, and lesson-level design. Total 78% (18 out of 23 points)

1.1 Course-Level Design

1.1a
Materials include an alignment guide outlining the TEKS, ELPS, and concepts covered, with a rationale for learning paths across grade levels (vertical alignment) and within the same grade level (horizontal alignment) as designed in the materials.
4 out of 5 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

1.1b
Materials include an implementation guide with usage recommendations and strategies for effective educator use, such as just-in-time supports, advanced learning, or as a course.
3 out of 3 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

1.1c
Materials include a TEKS correlation guide with recommended skill entry points based on diagnostic assessment results.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

1.1d
Materials include protocols with corresponding guidance for unit and lesson internalization.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

1.1e
Materials include resources and guidance for instructional leaders to support educators with implementing the materials as designed.
0 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

1.2 Lesson-Level Design

1.2a
If designed to be static, materials include detailed lesson plans with learning objectives, teacher and student materials, lesson components with suggested timeframes, and assessment resources aligned with the TEKS and ELPS.
7 out of 7 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

1.2b
If designed to be adaptive, materials include detailed lesson overviews with learning objectives, lesson components with suggested timeframes, and assessment resources aligned with the TEKS and ELPS.
Not scored

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

1.2c
Materials contain support for families in Spanish and English for each unit, with suggestions on supporting the progress of their student(s).
0 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

Rubric Section 2 Progress Monitoring Materials support educators in effective implementation through frequent, strategic opportunities to monitor and respond to student progress. Total TOTAL75% (18 out of 24 points) 75%
Section 2 Progress Monitoring Materials support educators in effective implementation through frequent, strategic opportunities to monitor and respond to student progress. Total 75% (18 out of 24 points)

2.1 Instructional Assessments

2.1a
Materials include the definition and intended purpose for the types of instructional assessments.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

2.1b
Materials include guidance to ensure consistent and accurate administration of instructional assessments.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

2.1c
Digital assessments include printable versions and accommodations, including text-to-speech, content and language supports, and calculators, that educators can enable or disable to support individual students.
0 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

2.1d
Materials include diagnostic assessments with TEKS-aligned tasks or questions, including interactive item types with varying complexity levels.
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

2.1e
Materials include a variety of formative assessments with TEKS-aligned tasks or questions, including interactive item types with varying complexity levels.
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

2.2 Data Analysis and Progress Monitoring

2.2a
Instructional assessments include scoring information and guidance for interpreting student performance, including rationale for each correct and incorrect response.
1 out of 3 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

2.2b
Materials provide guidance for the use of included tasks and activities to respond to student trends in performance on assessments.
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

2.2c
Materials include tools for teachers to track student progress and growth, and tools for students to track their own progress and growth.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

2.2d
If designed to be static, materials provide prompts and guidance to support educators in conducting frequent checks for understanding at key points throughout each lesson or activity.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

2.2e
If designed to be adaptive, materials provide frequent checks for understanding at key points throughout each lesson or activity.
Not scored

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

Rubric Section 3 Supports for All Learners Materials support educators in reaching all learners through design focused on engagement, representation, and action/expression for learner variability. Total TOTAL92% (36 out of 39 points) 92%
Section 3 Supports for All Learners Materials support educators in reaching all learners through design focused on engagement, representation, and action/expression for learner variability. Total 92% (36 out of 39 points)

3.1 Differentiation and Scaffolds

3.1a
Materials include explicit educator guidance for lessons or activities scaffolded for students who have not yet reached proficiency in prerequisite or grade-level concepts and skills.
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

3.1b
Materials include explicit educator guidance for language supports, including pre-teaching and embedded supports for developing academic vocabulary and unfamiliar references in text.
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

3.1c
Materials include explicit educator guidance for enrichment and extension activities for students who have demonstrated proficiency in grade-level and above grade-level content and skills.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

3.1d
Digital materials include accommodations, including text-to-speech, content and language supports, and calculators that educators can enable or disable to support individual students.
0 out of 3 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

3.1e
Materials include educator guidance on offering options and supports for students to demonstrate understanding of mathematical concepts in various ways, such as perform, express, and represent.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

3.2 Instructional Methods

3.2a
Materials include explicit (direct) prompts and guidance for educators to build knowledge by activating prior knowledge, anchoring big ideas, and highlighting and connecting key patterns, features, and relationships through multiple means of representation.
5 out of 5 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

3.2b
If designed to be static, materials include educator guidance for effective lesson delivery and facilitation using various instructional approaches.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

3.2c
Materials include multi-tiered intervention methods for various types of practice and structures and educator guidance to support effective implementation.
3 out of 3 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

3.2d
Materials include enrichment and extension methods that support various forms of engagement, and guidance to support educators in effective implementation.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

3.2e
Materials include prompts and guidance to support educators in providing timely feedback during lesson delivery.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

3.3 Support for Emergent Bilingual Students

3.3a
If designed to be static, materials include educator guidance on providing and incorporating linguistic accommodations for all levels of language proficiency [as defined by the English Language Proficiency Standards (ELPS)], which are designed to engage students in using increasingly more academic language.
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

3.3b
If designed to be adaptive, materials include embedded linguistic accommodations for all levels of language proficiency [as defined by the English Language Proficiency Standards (ELPS)], which are designed to engage students in using increasingly more academic language.
Not scored

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

3.3c
Materials include implementation guidance to support educators in effectively using the materials in state-approved bilingual/ESL programs.
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

3.3d
Materials include embedded guidance to support emergent bilingual students in developing academic vocabulary, increasing comprehension, building background knowledge, and making cross-linguistic connections through oral and written discourse.
8 out of 8 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

3.3e
If designed for dual language immersion (DLI) programs, materials include resources that outline opportunities to address metalinguistic transfer from English to the partner language.
Not scored

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

Rubric Section 4 Depth and Coherence of Key Concepts Materials are designed to meet the rigor of the standards while connecting concepts within and across grade levels/courses. Total TOTAL100% (16 out of 16 points) 100%
Section 4 Depth and Coherence of Key Concepts Materials are designed to meet the rigor of the standards while connecting concepts within and across grade levels/courses. Total 100% (16 out of 16 points)

4.1 Depth of Key Concepts

4.1a
Practice opportunities throughout learning pathways (including instructional assessments) require students to demonstrate depth of understanding aligned to the TEKS.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

4.1b
Questions and tasks, including enrichment and extension materials, increase in rigor and complexity, leading to grade-level and above grade-level proficiency in the mathematics TEKS.
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

4.2 Coherence of Key Concepts

4.2a
Materials demonstrate coherence across concepts horizontally within the grade level by connecting patterns, big ideas, and relationships.
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

4.2b
Materials demonstrate coherence vertically across concepts and grade bands, including connections from grades 3–12, by connecting patterns, big ideas, and relationships.
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

4.2c
Materials demonstrate coherence across lessons or activities by connecting students’ prior knowledge of concepts and procedures to the mathematical concepts to be learned in the current grade level and future grade levels.
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

4.3 Coherence and Variety of Practice

4.3a
Materials provide spaced retrieval opportunities with previously learned skills and concepts across learning pathways.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

4.3b
Materials provide interleaved practice opportunities with previously learned skills and concepts across learning pathways.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

Rubric Section 5 Balance of Conceptual and Procedural Understanding Materials are designed to balance conceptual understanding, procedural skills, and fluency. Total TOTAL95% (36 out of 38 points) 95%
Section 5 Balance of Conceptual and Procedural Understanding Materials are designed to balance conceptual understanding, procedural skills, and fluency. Total 95% (36 out of 38 points)

5.1 Development of Conceptual Understanding

5.1a
Questions and tasks provide opportunities for students to interpret, analyze, and evaluate mathematical concepts and complex, real-world situations.
3 out of 3 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.1b
Questions and tasks provide opportunities for students to create concrete models and representations of mathematical situations.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.1c
Questions and tasks provide opportunities for students to apply conceptual understanding to new problem situations and contexts.
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.2 Development of Fluency

5.2a
Materials provide tasks that are designed to build student automaticity and fluency necessary to complete grade-level mathematical tasks.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.2b
Materials provide opportunities for students to practice the application of efficient, flexible, and accurate mathematical procedures throughout learning pathways.
3 out of 3 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.2c
Materials provide opportunities for students to evaluate mathematical representations, models, strategies, and solutions for efficiency, flexibility, and accuracy throughout learning pathways.
3 out of 3 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.2d
Materials contain guidance to support students in selecting the most efficient approaches when solving mathematics problems.
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.3 Balance of Conceptual Understanding and Procedural Fluency

5.3a
Materials explicitly state how the conceptual and procedural emphasis of the TEKS are addressed.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.3b
Questions and tasks provide opportunities for students to use concrete models, pictorial representations, and abstract models as required by the TEKS.
3 out of 3 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.3c
Materials include supports for students in connecting, creating, defining, and explaining concrete and representational models to abstract (symbolic/numeric/algorithmic) concepts, as required by the TEKS.
6 out of 6 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.4 Development of Academic Mathematical Language

5.4a
Materials provide opportunities for students to develop academic mathematical language using visuals, manipulatives, or other language development strategies.
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.4b
Materials include embedded educator guidance to scaffold, support, and extend students’ use of academic mathematical vocabulary in context when communicating with peers and educators.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.4c
Materials include embedded guidance to support student application of appropriate mathematical language and academic vocabulary in discourse.
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.4d
Materials include embedded guidance to facilitate mathematical conversations allowing students to hear, refine, and use math language with peers.
1 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.4e
Materials include embedded guidance to anticipate a variety of student answers including exemplar responses to questions and tasks, including guidance to support and/or redirect inaccurate student responses.
1 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.5 Process Standards Connections

5.5a
TEKS process standards are integrated appropriately into the materials.
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.5b
Materials include a description of how process standards are incorporated and connected throughout the learning pathways.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.5c
Materials include an overview of the TEKS process standards incorporated into each lesson.
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

Rubric Section 6 Productive Struggle Materials support students in applying disciplinary practices to productive problem-solving, including explaining and revising their thinking. Total TOTAL71% (15 out of 21 points) 71%
Section 6 Productive Struggle Materials support students in applying disciplinary practices to productive problem-solving, including explaining and revising their thinking. Total 71% (15 out of 21 points)

6.1 Student Self-Efficacy

6.1a
Materials provide opportunities for students to think mathematically, persevere through solving problems, and to make sense of mathematics.
3 out of 3 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

6.1b
Materials support students in understanding, explaining, and justifying that there can be multiple ways to solve problems and complete tasks.
3 out of 3 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

6.1c
Materials are designed to require students to make sense of mathematics through multiple opportunities for students to do, write about, and discuss math with peers and/or educators.
3 out of 3 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

6.2 Facilitating Productive Struggle

6.2a
Materials support educators in guiding students to share and reflect on their problem-solving approaches, including explanations, arguments, justifications, and multiple points of entry.
4 out of 8 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

6.2b
Materials include prompts and guidance to support educators in providing explanatory feedback based on student responses and anticipated misconceptions.
2 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

Program Information

Print Version
Estimated number of pages:
Digital Version
Estimated number of click or scroll pages:
back to top